The Dual Nature of Fictionalising Personal Narratives: Exploring the Case of "Baby Reindeer"
- LJ Cadogan
- May 6, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Jan 13
In the realm of storytelling, the art of fictionalising personal narratives holds a dual promise: it offers a means of retelling intimate stories while safeguarding the privacy of those involved. However, recent events surrounding Richard Gadd's acclaimed autobiographical Netflix production, "Baby Reindeer," have sparked a critical examination of the efficacy and ethical implications of this approach. While Gadd's intent was to delve into the depths of personal trauma, the alleged identification of real-life individuals challenges the notion of successful fictionalization. Gadd himself has, I must add, spoken out against those who have turned detective, and I must commend him for the amount of bravery it no doubt took to create “Baby Reindeer”, in which he also plays himself.
Fictionalising personal narratives can be a powerful tool for those seeking to share deeply personal experiences without implicating or endangering individuals associated with those stories. By altering details, amalgamating characters, and crafting composite events, writers can delve into the depths of their experiences and create a narrative that resonates emotionally while maintaining a respectful distance from real-life events and individuals.
The reported ability of strangers to identify the real-life stalker allegedly portrayed in the production is troubling, even more so if it is proven to be true. It raises significant concerns about the efficacy of fictionalisation in protecting privacy. While Gadd took measures to obscure identities and present a fictionalised account, the interconnectedness of the digital age and the power of audience interpretation can potentially breach the veil of fiction, exposing individuals to unwarranted attention and harm.
So, where does this leave us in understanding the complexities of fictionalising personal narratives?
It underscores the importance of recognizing the inherent limitations and risks associated with this approach. While fictionalisation can provide a degree of protection, it is not fool proof, and writers must remain vigilant in their efforts to mitigate potential harm. This may involve consulting with legal experts, conducting thorough risk assessments, and considering alternative storytelling techniques to safeguard the privacy and well-being of all individuals involved.
Furthermore, the case of "Baby Reindeer" highlights the need for ongoing dialogue and reflection on best practices in narrative ethics. Writers must continually reassess their storytelling choices and engage in open discussions about the ethical implications of their work. Transparency, consent, and empathy should be guiding principles in the creation of fictionalized personal narratives, ensuring that the dignity and autonomy of all parties involved are respected and upheld.
While "Baby Reindeer" serves as a thought-provoking example of the complexities of fictionalising personal stories, it also underscores the need for a nuanced and critical approach to narrative ethics. By acknowledging the dual nature of fictionalisation and striving for ethical storytelling practices, writers can navigate the delicate balance between personal expression and social responsibility, ultimately fostering a more inclusive and empathetic landscape.